FAQ

Answers to the 39 most frequently asked questions by managers participating in the live seminar:

(#1) What is the best way to start out, at the beginning of a management relationship? Is it better to start off being hands off and then gradually become more hands on? Or is it better to start out being more hands on and then gradually become more hands off?

Remember the old rule when it comes to school teachers? Start off very strict and then, after the students come to expect, accept, and adapt to the strict regime, you can relax a bit. As long as the students continue to act like they are still in the strict regime, you don’t have to be quite as strict.

The same basic rule applies to managing employees, but you have to do it one person at a time.

If you start out very hands on, you’ll figure out just how closely the person needs to be managed and you can calibrate your approach accordingly. As well, you’ll make it clear right at the outset that your expectations are high and that you are willing and able to manage very closely. So start out very hands on: Meet with the employee every day. Break goals down into lists of concrete action steps with lots of guidelines and very short deadlines. And then, as the employee delivers on those expectations, you can gradually back off. If the employee keeps delivering, back off some more. But don’t back off too much. Keep meeting regularly to review priorities, clarify expectations, and to monitor, measure and document that person’s performance.

If the employee’s performance falters in any way, tighten the reins for a while. Be much more hands on. If the employee slows down, be more hands on. If the employee starts missing details, be more hands on. If there is some behavior problem, be more hands on. And by the way, the same goes for any major change that is not related to a diminution of the employee’s performance: If there is a big change in circumstances, be more hands on. If the employee has a change in role, new tasks or responsibilities, a new project, be more hands. Be more hands on until you have things under control, until the employee is acting like he is in a strict regime. Then you can back off again.

***

The obvious corollary here is this: What about training? Shouldn’t we be able to train employees thoroughly at the outset of their employment and then expect them to do their jobs properly? Think about the Marine Corps. They put their new employees through an eleven week boot camp. But after that, they still manage them very, very closely. Do you have an eleven week training program to tear down and rebuild your new employees? Just how thorough and rigorous is your initial training? Even if it is thorough and rigorous, you cannot simply train a new employee and then assume that he will do all the work very well very fast all day long. You have to keep managing that person. In that sense, you could say that there is little difference between good management and ongoing training. You cannot simply train an employee once at the outset of a job and assume he has all the tools and techniques he needs to do the job properly. You have to talk with the employee about his work on an ongoing basis: Talk through tasks step by step, spell out expectations, and go over standard operating procedures. Then you have to monitor his actual work performance to see that he gets it right. Reinforce him when he gets it right and correct him when he gets it wrong. If he keeps getting it wrong, break it down into smaller pieces and spell it out more clearly… over and over again. If he keeps getting it right, take a step back, give him some more space to make decisions and take action on his own. Keep monitoring his performance to see that he continues making the right decisions and taking the right actions. If he does, reinforce and reward him accordingly. Perhaps he is ready for expanded tasks and responsibilities.

(#2) At what point can I determine if an employee requires so much of my management time that it’s just not worth it? How can I tell if an employee is just too high maintenance?

First, let me promise you this: Most employees require more management time than you think and most require much more management time than you might wish to spend. Some employees need to be coached into their roles every step of the way.

Second, here is some good news: Most employees require more of your management time in the early stages of a job and less over time. Most require more management time in the early stages of a new task, responsibility, project, or role, and then less over time. This is how employee development actually plays out. If you provide a lot of direction, guidance, feedback, and support, hammering away at expectations and standard operating procedures and best practices, employees learn and improve. They grow. They get better at their jobs. They get better at managing themselves. They get better at being managed by you. And thus, they usually require less time over time. But this only works if you put in the time, up front, over time, to build that person up. (As I’ve said a bunch of times, this is what I call “real empowerment”!)

Third, with every individual, you have figure out just how closely the person needs to be managed and you can calibrate your approach accordingly. Some people, you will discover, require a huge amount of management time in order to succeed. And with some people, the amount of time necessary does not diminish much. Hands-off managers sometimes mistake these employees as incessant low performers. Hands-on managers usually discover that these employees can and will do good work, but only with constant coaching and assistance.

So when is it too much? That is a business decision you have to make for yourself. Is this employee much less able and skilled and motivated than other employees you could hire for this job from your available labor pool? Are you sure? Or is it the case that, if you replace the employee, the labor pool available to you for this job is likely to yield a similar employee? Sometimes the punch line is this: Given your available labor and given this particular job, the only way you are going to get high performance consistently is if you commit to very high intensity management---twice, three times, four times a day. Sometimes the punch line is this: No way! I’m paying this person too much and this job is too high level to justify the kind of management time this person requires.

(#3) Isn’t one goal of management to help employees get better at managing themselves? At some point, I would hope, employees grow and develop and become more self-managing. How do I help an employee get better at managing himself?

In my view, everybody needs to be managed. Even CEOs need to be managed by boards of directors. But of course, one of your primary goals should be to help your employees grow and develop and become more self managing. How? By managing the employee very, very well.

By managing the employee very, very well, you are demonstrating the same methods he’ll have to apply when it comes to managing himself. You are demonstrating that self-management involves a constant accounting: What is expected of me? How is my performance measuring up to those expectations? What can I do to improve? What do I need to revise and adjust? Constantly clarify priorities; clarify expectations; clarify plans; clarify action steps; clarify timelines.

Second, by managing the employee very, very well, you should be teaching the employee what to do and how to do it. On a whole range of tasks, the employee should be learning through sheer repetition: The employee should be learning guidelines, specifications, and standard operating procedures.

Third, by managing the employee very, very well, you and the employee are likely to be creating tools (like checklists) that should help the employee become more self-managing.

Fourth, by managing the employee very, very well, you should be gradually expanding the employee’s scope of responsibility. This means bigger goals or bigger constellations of goals. This means longer deadlines. This means you are stepping back, meeting every other day instead of daily; meeting once a week instead of every other day.

Fifth, by managing the employee very, very well, you should be teaching the employee great work habits like these:

  • Start every endeavor with clear goals. Before you invest your time and energy in anything at all, clarify exactly what it is you are trying to accomplish.
  • Deadlines are the key to making a plan of action and managing your time effectively. The trick is to use deadlines every step of the way. Break up larger goals and deadlines into smaller pieces---intermediate goals and deadlines.
  • Break intermediate goals and deadlines into lists of concrete actions (this is the classic to-do list). As you tackle each concrete action and move toward each intermediate goal and deadline, you can monitor your effectiveness along the way. If you find yourself off schedule, you know you need to reassess: Are you taking the concrete actions you’ve planned? Are they taking longer than you thought? Or are you running across unexpected obstacles? Do you need to revise the plan? Or do you need to change something about your work habits?
  • Take action and keep moving forward. Every concrete action can be broken down into minute components and each minute component is, itself, a concrete action. Sometimes when you get bogged down in the feeling that you are “not getting anything done,” this is a very helpful reality check and it can get you focused and back on track. If you break every task into its minute components and start tackling them one at a time, you will start moving forward.
  • Use time wisely. There are 168 hours in a week. How do you use them? There are 1,440 minutes in a day. How do you use them? Keep track of your time and use it with purpose.
  • Be high quality. You are what you write, say, create, and do (in no particular order):
    - Think before you speak (and rehearse).
    - Outline before you write (and always do second and third drafts).
    - Plan before you take action.
    - Double- and triple- and quadruple-check anything and everything you do.
  • Be full of integrity. If your boss (or customer) of the day wants you to lie, cheat, steal, or harm others, don't do it. Quit if necessary. Blow the whistle if you think it's appropriate. No matter what, don't get involved in unethical dealings. It's not worth any price. Be honest and honest people will gravitate toward you. But, let's face it, that's the easy part. I mean, how much judgment or effort is really required to reject downright dishonesty and corruption? The hard part is when integrity requires more than sitting on a high horse in judgment of others. Real integrity requires proactive behavior: Breaking your back to deliver, if necessary, when people are counting on you; helping others, even when nobody is there to give you credit; intervening when others are being treated unfairly; and speaking out loud for unpopular causes (if you believe in them).
  • Be flexible enough to go, on any given day, from one boss to another; from one team to another; from one organization to another; from one set of tasks to another. At any given time, you may be balancing three part-time "jobs" or moving from one short-term project to another or working a day job and starting your own business or doing all of those things and going to school at the same time. To move seamlessly between and among these different spheres every day, you need to be as adaptable as a chameleon.
  • Be one of the few people who is willing to do whatever is needed, whenever it's needed, whether it is something you already know how to do or not, whether it is supposed to be "your job" or not, whether it is something you love to do or something you are going to have to just tolerate for a few weeks or months.
  • Be good at evaluating context. No matter who you are, what you want to achieve, or how you want to be, your role in any given situation is determined---in part---by factors that have nothing to do with you, per se. These are pre-existing factors, independent factors, factors that would be present even if you were not. Before you can figure out where you fit, you need to get a handle on the other pieces of the puzzle. Ask yourself: Where am I (what is this place)? What is going on here (what is the mission of the group)? Why is everybody here (what is at stake for the group and for each person in the group)? When did they all get here (not just today, but in the overall context)? Who are all these people (what role does each person play)? How are they accustomed to doing things around here (what is standard operating procedure)? Now ask yourself where you fit in this picture. Why am I here? What is at stake for me? When did I get here? What is my appropriate role in relation to the other people in the group? What is my appropriate role in relation to the mission? Who am I in this context? Always play your role very, very well before you try to build on it.
Sixth, no matter how good your employee gets at managing himself, remember, he still needs you. If not, then you shouldn’t be his boss anymore.

(#4) I have some employees who are so talented, so skilled, and so motivated that all I really want to do is get out of their way. How do you manage a superstar?

(#5) I manage too many people. I can see how your approach would work great if I only had a handful of employees. But I have 32 employees to manage. How can I possibly be hands on with 32 employees?

(#6) What about team meetings? You put so much focus on one-on-one meetings between managers and employees. When is it ok to substitute team meetings for one-on-ones?

(#7) I can’t do everything all the time. I cannot manage every single person as closely as I would like. For that reason, I sometimes decide with one employee or another that I am going to just leave that person alone, that I am NOT going to spend time managing that person. Is it ever ok to decide that I am just NOT going to manage a particular employee?

(#8) I manage people in a remote location. How can I possibly be a hands-on manager with employees I rarely see?

(#9) I manage employees who work different shifts from me. I am never (or rarely) there when they are. How can I manage them if I am not there?

(#10) I manage people doing work in areas where I don’t have knowledge or experience. How can I manage people if they know much more about their work than I do?

(#11) I don’t have direct authority over certain employees, but I still have to manage them. How can I manage an employee if I am not really her boss?

(#12) We have a matrix structure (or we work integrally with outside vendors). That means my employee(s) often has to wait for another employee in another business (internal or external) to finish some piece of the puzzle before my employees can continue his work. How can I fairly hold my employee to deadlines if they are held up by someone in a whole other business?

(#13) Some of the employees I manage answer to other bosses in addition to me. That means I have to compete for that employee’s time and energy. When I give that employee an assignment, it’s not always clear to me how many other assignments that employee is trying to juggle with other bosses. Is the employee taking on too much? Plus, even after I’ve given an assignment to that employee, he sometimes will get another “urgent” assignment from another boss, which interferes with completing the assignment from me. What do I do?

(#14) My problem is conflicts among team members. Often I am dealing with “he said/she said” situations. How can I referee arguments and personality clashes among employees?

(#15) What if there is longstanding “bad blood” on the team? This is beyond the typical trivial conflicts that arise between employees on occasion. These are longstanding conflicts between individuals on the team, or even worse, between cliques or rival ‘camps’ who refuse to support each other and often undermine each other.

(#16) My problem is my own boss. How can I be a successful hands-on manager if my own boss is constantly undermining me?

(#17) My problem is not with being the boss, but rather that my own boss has no idea how to manage me. Is there some way I can manage my boss?

(#18) I manage managers who are supposed to be managing the next level of employees. But my managers are dropping the ball. My managers are not managing their employees. That means I often have to go around my managers and manage their employees. As a result, these employees often go around their managers and come directly to me. How can I get my managers to manage?

(#19) The corporate culture in this organization doesn’t support hands-on management. Our culture is one of very hands-off management. How can I be a hands-on manager when everybody else is hands-off?

(#20) We are already understaffed and everybody on our team is already overworked. I cannot fire my low performers because then the remaining employees would have to work even harder. Isn’t 50% performance from a low performer sometimes better than having no employee in that role at all?

(#21) The talent available---the quality and skill level of employees in our labor pool---is just not up to the level we need. I cannot hire enough high performers. Why should I invest so much time and energy in managing when the best I can hope for is mediocre performance? Why bother? (This question has two corollaries: Recruiting and retention.)

(#22) Our problem is a language barrier. Some of my employees speak a different language than I do. How can I manage employees if I cannot communicate with them?

(#23) Priorities shift and change. How can I maintain clear expectations for my employees when expectations change every day?

(#24) I’ve been accepting mediocrity for a long time. How can I suddenly change the standards?

(#25) I’ve inherited one or more employees whose managers have been accepting mediocrity for a long time. How can I suddenly change the standard?

(#26) I’m managing people who were my peers before I was their manager. It’s really hard to get them to respect my authority and accept me as the “boss.” What should I do?

(#27) Some of the people I manage are my friends. How do I separate my role as boss from my role as friend? (What about the opposite situation? What about the employee whom you don’t really know and with whom you cannot seem to make a personal connection?)

(#28) My employee has an unusual source of power in our working relationship… This makes it very hard to exercise power as the boss. How do I manage this person even though he has so much power in the situation?

(#29) My problems are laws, regulations, policies, procedures, EEO, unions, contracts… and the HR Police. How can I be a strong manager when I have to practically become an employment lawyer in order to deal with all the rules and red tape?

(#30) My problem is that my employees push back and argue every step of the way. How am I supposed to respond to the push backs?

(#31) The problems I have with certain employees are intangible, like bad attitude. How do I deal with intangible performance issues?

(#32) You say that all performance problems in the workplace should be dealt with firmly and immediately… Really? All problems? Aren’t some problems small enough that they should be left alone?

(#33) In our company, it’s very hard to fire people. How do I lose the losers?

(#34) In our company, it’s very hard to get clearance and resources for any kind of special rewards. So how do I reward the high performers? (The corollary: What is a manager supposed to do when employees lack sufficient resources to carry out their responsibilities?)

(#35) I agree with you that some people deserve more rewards than others. But I am often reluctant when it comes to singling out one employee or another for special rewards or even praise. I am afraid other employees will feel demoralized because someone else, and not them, was singled out for praise and reward. Should I single people out for praise and reward in secret so other employees are not demoralized?

(#36) What happens when an employee gets some special reward and then his performance starts to slip? Let’s say the employee wants a flexible schedule and his performance has been great. I give him a flexible schedule and all of a sudden his performance is not so great. Do I take away that special reward?

(#37) What if the nature of the employee’s job is to be creative and innovative? This requires that an employee be willing to take risks and make mistakes. Should you still manage that employee closely? Should you still tell him what to do and how to do it? Should you still monitor, measure and document? Won’t that inhibit the employee’s creativity and innovation? Won’t that make the employee less likely to take the necessary risks and make the necessary mistakes?

(#38) I’m a nurse… or a doctor… or an accountant… engineer… landscaper… merchandiser… I’m a __________ [fill in the blank]. I am a professional, not a leader/manager/coach. I want to spend my time practicing my profession, not managing people. Nobody held my hand when I was coming up the ranks as a professional. I was expected to live up to my profession; to be “professional.” Why should I take time away from practicing my profession to manage people?

(#39) I have bad moments, bad days, bad weeks, even bad months. I know that consistency is really important when it comes to managing. But as hard as I try, I sometimes drop the ball. I know my employees notice. And it makes it really hard to come back in and start managing again, after I’ve been disengaged for some period of time. Once I drop the ball, how do I bounce back and take charge again?

Helpful Hints:
Simply click on the questions to the left to see the answers.